Im glad to see eHarmony answering chat with mistressin recognized weblog to an article called „Marriage-Maker Claims Are Tied in Knots ” from Wall Street Journal. The WSJ post examines a few of the marriage stats released by internet dating sites like eHarmony in addition to the strategy accustomed assess these types of statistics. We talked somewhat about that topic and, a few weeks ago after initial WSJ post was actually released (see Story).
The WSJ article failed to check out kindly regarding stats introduced by adult dating sites, and also for the most component I buy into the author. Anyone does need to understand just how these stats are created. Of all of the internet dating sites mentioned into the WSJ article, „eHarmony stands apart as one of the a lot more careful ones”. It is not exactly a glowing document for eHarmony thus, they decided to post a response on their blog.
In the eHarmony article they’re going into further details on how they calculated that their dating website was actually responsible for 2per cent of marriages in the usa, from 12-month period closing March 2007. All of the details we currently realized about from a previously revealed PDF document titled „eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see tale), although blog post really does clean out some more details. What this web site post really does show is actually, eHarmony is trying becoming as open and transparent with their investigation conclusions as it can. In my opinion title „start correspondence” may without a doubt be a good solution when it comes to formal eHarmony weblog.
Here is the complete eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street log about precisely how they calculate their matrimony data. For further information about this dating site, study our very own breakdown of eHarmony.